Search for: "Jim Harper"
Results 81 - 100
of 320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2015, 2:20 am
.: Designing a Regulatory System for the Age of Decentralized Virtual Currencies (8:30 - 10:15) (Delaware Suite, Lobby Level): Victor Fleischer (San Diego), James Gatto (Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman), Jim Harper (Global Policy Counsel, The Bitcoin Foundation), Sarah Jane Hughes (Indiana),... [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 4:10 am
Keith Harper Hon. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the previous blog, I noted that the logical next step in understanding “privacy as fairness” was to examine if it is possible to identify principles that would effectively guide policy and regulation aimed at such fairness. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 12:30 am
"Karen Abbot's new work, Liar Temptress Soldier Spy: Four Women Undercover in the Civil War (Harper) is reviewed in both the Washington Post (here), and in the Los Angeles Times (here). [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 10:47 am
In discussing the changes, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty refers to citizen complaints. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:53 am
Michael Geist loves Canada’s anti-spam law (CASL). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
Commentary comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View, Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, Orin Kerr of the Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Shapiro at the Cato Institute, Jim Harper at the Cato Institute, Eric Posner at Slate, Ian Millhiser at Think Progress, Charles Cooke at National Review, Will Baude at the Volokh Conspiracy, Andrea Peterson at The Washington Post, Doug Kendall at The Washington Post, and Hadar Aviram at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:41 am
Harper appoints George R. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:05 pm
” [Steven Malanga] Why, as a textbook author, Alex Tabarrok has concluded copyright law is out of control [Marginal Revolution] Remembering when patent examiners were celebrities (in the 19th Century) [Slate] Someone sends Jim Harper a dubious DMCA takedown notice, and this is his response [Cato] Tweet Tags: copyright, loser pays, nastygrams, patent litigation, patent trolls, Supreme CourtIntellectual property roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the… [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
“Today is a very sad day for me, for our government and for all of our country,” Prime Minister Stephen Harper, his voice quaking, said of the friend who had stood at his side since the Conservatives took power in 2006. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
” At Cato at Liberty, Jim Harper discusses the amicus brief that Cato recently filed in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Nifong based his insight on material gleaned from a Harper’s Magazine article (!!) [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:31 pm
Steven Harper is weighing in. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm
"A recurring theme," writes Jim Lafferty, "is Abrams’s contention that attacks on First Amendment freedoms come from the left as well as the right." [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:48 pm
Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy Studies, Cato Institute Ms. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:47 am
Cato’s Jim Harper cited Black’s Law Dictionary, which lists as a primary definition of relevancy, “applicability to the issue joined. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
Cato’s Jim Harper and I have contended that all these bulk data seizure programs are both illegal under Section 215 of the Patriot Act and unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:05 pm
Tech Industry Calls for Surveillance Reform” [Corporate Counsel, EFF, Marvin Ammori/USA Today] New Federalist Society symposium on NSA/FISA surveillance and bulk data collection includes names like Randy Barnett, Jim Harper, Jeremy Rabkin, Stewart Baker, Grover Joseph Rees [Engage, Randy Barnett] Nowadays “law enforcement can feel free to admit their traffic stops are pretextual” Thanks, Drug War! [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 12:00 pm
The symposium includes my very brief essay with Cato’s Jim Harper, Why NSA’s Bulk Data Seizures Are Illegal and Unconstitutional. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
High times at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service [Luke Rosiak, Examiner via Jim Harper, Cato] 6th Circuit: In ruling company’s suit against union to be unfair labor practice, NLRB breezed past First Amendment issues [NLRB v. [read post]
