Search for: "Jock v. Sterling Jewelers Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 6:36 am
Earlier this month, the Second Circuit (Jock v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 11:12 am
Sterling Jewelers Inc., 646 F.3d 113, 124 (2d Cir. 2011) (“Jock I”), it held that “the issue of whether the agreement permitted class arbitration was squarely presented to the arbitrator. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 11:12 am
Sterling Jewelers Inc., 646 F.3d 113, 124 (2d Cir. 2011) (“Jock I”), it held that “the issue of whether the agreement permitted class arbitration was squarely presented to the arbitrator. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:31 am
(Jock v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 1:18 pm
Jock, et al v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:52 am
Sterling Jewelers, Inc., November 16, 2015, Rakoff, J.). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
See, e.g., Jock v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:31 am
Sterling Jewelers, Inc. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
Sterling Jewelers Inc., November 18, 2019, Hall, P.). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
See, e.g., Jock v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:57 pm
Sterling Jewelers Inc., 646 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2011), holding that, with no “silence” stipulation, a broadly-drafted arbitration clause constituted an implicit agreement to authorize class treatment. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:31 pm
Instead, Oxford largely adopts a narrower reading of Stolt-Neilsen, embodied in decisions like Jock v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:17 pm
In Jock v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 11:42 am
The three-judge panel in Jock v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:04 am
Sterling Jewelers Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Sterling Jewelers, Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (2d Cir. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 8:42 am
Sterling Jewelers, Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:26 pm
Sterling Jewelers Inc., 646 F.3d 113, 123 (2d Cir.2011); see Jones v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
Jock, et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 11:00 am
Sterling Jewelers Inc., 2011 U.S. [read post]
