Search for: "Joe Lee v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2014, 11:30 am
South Bend, Indiana-Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. of Feasterville, Pennsylvania, via a Kentucky intellectual property lawyer, has sued in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Lee H. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Joe Dunman, Brief for Amicus Curiae The Kentucky Commission on Human Rights, Nelson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm by John Floyd
District Court Judge Lee Yeakel, who sat in Austin before his May 31, 2023 retirement. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
The Constitution demands better [Ilya Shapiro on Cato Institute cert amicus brief in Copeland v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
In a big decision last week that has immediate implications for companies facing derivative claims in the 9th Circuit and may eventually head to the US Supreme Court, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Lee v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:05 am by Steve Hall
You can view archived video of the oral argument in Ray Hobbs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 8:30 am
These are based on input from Andrew Appel, Joe Calandrino, Will Clarkson, Ari Feldman, Ed Felten, Alex Halderman, Joseph Lorenzo Hall, Tim Lee, Paul Ohm, David Robinson, Dan Wallach, Harlan Yu, and Bill Zeller. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
Supreme Court: Baker Doesn’t Have to Place Pro-Gay Marriage Message on Cake” [Dale Carpenter, Peter Tatchell, Lee v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
A notice of Saul Cornell’s research in advance of the oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:41 am by Brian A. Comer
  We believe this objectivity requirement is consistent with the quality control element of [State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Joe Kernan urges the Court to grant review in Davis v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:13 am by Conor McEvily
” At this blog, Alan Horowitz analyzes last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]