Search for: "John F Merrill" Results 41 - 60 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2010, 2:15 pm
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966)). [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Merrill Lynch, 672 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 2012), is a head-scratcher in the post-Wal-Mart world. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Merrill-National Laboratories, 646 F.Supp. 856 (D. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:30 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Merrill Lynch, 672 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 2012), Posner cautioned trial court judges to apply the same analytical rigor required by Dukes in denying class certification motions as they do to granting them. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:21 pm by Susan Mangiero
Carey is President of F-Squared Retirement Solutions, a subsidiary of F-Squared Investments. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
The famous statistician John Wilder Tukey famously remarked that the collective noun for the statistical profession should be a “quarrel” of statisticians.[1] Recently, philosopher Deborah Mayo, who has written insightfully about the “statistics wars,”[2] published an important article that addressed an attempt by some officers of the American Statistical Association (ASA) to pass off their personal views of statistical significance testing as views of the ASA.[3]… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:47 am by Sean Wajert
Merril Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 259 F.3d 154, 167 (3d Cir. 2001) (quoting Gen. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 835 F.2d 1031, 1033 (3d Cir. 1987)). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir. 1989) (“Fortunately, we do not have to resolve any of the above questions [as to bias and confounding], since the studies presented to us incorporate the possibility of these factors by the use of a confidence interval. [read post]