Search for: "Johns Manville"
Results 61 - 80
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2022, 1:08 am
Employees of Johns Manville started claiming asbestos-related disabilities as early as the 1920s, and in 1929 the first asbestos-related lawsuit was filed in New Jersey by a woman named Anna Pirskowski, an employee of Johns Manville. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
The Manville Corporation, formerly the Johns-Manville Corporation, was one of the first asbestos companies to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 3:12 pm
Simply stated, Travelers Insurance Company, who provided general liability coverage and other insurance between 1947 and 1976 to Johns Manville Corp, is no longer required to pay nearly $500 million towards asbestos settlements; specifically, the claims that center on the asbestos products manufactured by now-bankrupt Johns Manville Corp., one of the largest manufacturers of asbestos products in U.S. history. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 4:28 pm
Shelton, who died at 87 years of age, was alleged by his counsel to have been exposed to asbestos sold by Advocate Mines that was used to manufacture Johns Manville Transite pipes, when Mr. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:41 am
(In re Johns Manville Corp.) can be found here. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Why could GPC and NAPA not prove at trial what Manville knew? [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 5:17 am
JM Eagle was created in 1982, after the bankruptcy of Johns Manville, the first major corporation to seek protection from asbestos claims by filing for bankruptcy. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:24 am
The plaintiffs sued insurers of Johns-Manville Corporation for hiding the dangers of exposure to asbestos-containing products. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:02 am
Jun 20, 2009 The US Supreme Court ruled that the direct action claims against Travelers Insurance Company for its conduct in the asbestos conspiracy with Johns-Manville Corporation (Manville) were barred by the 1986 reorganization ... [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 6:23 pm
The Union Asbestos and Rubber Company and Johns Manville were the first in a series of companies who have sough protection. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 12:08 am
In the 1920s, Johns Manville employees started claiming asbestos-related disabilities. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:55 pm
Interesting asbestos fact: Henry Johns (the Johns in Johns-Manville) died because of asbestos when he was only 40. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:02 pm
Attorneys for the family argued that the two companies conspired with other firms, including UNARCO, Johns-Manville, Raybestos-Manhattan, Owens-Illinois, Owens Corning and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company to suppress information about the hazards of asbestos. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:29 am
If it weren’t for punitive damage awards well in excess of $200k, Johns Manville might still be pumping out asbestos products. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:36 am
His more than 30 years practicing law have been highlighted by asbestos litigation taking on insulation maker Johns Manville. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:58 am
Johns Manville, the Court upheld the Industrial Commission’s decision that the plaintiff had developed asbestosis from asbestos exposure during the 50’s and 60’s, that the testimony of plaintiff’s rebuttal expert was properly considered, and that the plaintiff was disabled due to his asbestosis under N.C.G.S. 97-54. [read post]
3 May 2012, 9:17 am
However, upon learning of the report, Johns-Manville used it considerable political power to stop it from being released to the public. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
Johns-Manville Sales Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:38 am
Showing that Johns Manville was well aware of the extraordinarily great hazard of crocidolite would have been relatively easy to do from past transcripts, articles, speeches, and litigation conduct of the Johns Manville companies. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:44 am
Sound View Innovations, LLC, Case IPR2018-00582, Paper 34 (Aug. 5, 2019) (designated informative on Dec. 11, 2019) (finding insufficient justification to combine references); Obviousness: Johns Manville Corp. v. [read post]
