Search for: "Johnson v. California" Results 41 - 60 of 1,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm by Steve Sady
After Johnson, the Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the decision, and remanded in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 9:28 pm
One that appears in the pages of the California Appellate Reporter many, many times. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 2:06 pm
(See Kim, supra, 9 Cal.5th at pp. 83-85; see also Johnson, supra, 66 Cal.App.5th at p. 930; Rocha v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
The 2nd District Court of Appeal recently affirmed a ruling by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Jane Johnson in Perez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:48 am by Susan Brenner
The liaison told Eckel that, according to the attorney general for Baja California, Mexico, where Johnson's residence was located, a warrantless search would be legal as long as Johnson's landlord consented. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:35 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Morgan Big Problems in California’s New Law Restricting Employers’ Access to Employees’ Online Accounts (Forbes Cross-Post) Fight Over Access to Log-in Credentials for Blog Does not Trigger Copyright Preemption – Insynq v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 12:19 pm
Why does today's opinion by the California Supreme Court, which overrules the Court's eight-year old Equal Protection decision in Hofsheier, remind me of the old Gilda Radner skit. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 2:14 am
One of them is Drug and Device Law’s post on the California Supreme Court decision adopting the sophisticated user doctrine in product liability cases, Johnson v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:33 pm by Betsy Johnson
By: Betsy Johnson California employers have been waiting since October 2008 for the California Supreme Court to issue it decisions in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm by Ad Law Defense
  Just ask the Los Angeles City Attorney after the recent decision by the California Court of Appeals in The People v. [read post]