Search for: "Johnson v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Johnson v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:59 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323, 350-52 (2005). [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 12:30 am
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005) four Justices agreed Williamson County produces absurd results and denies federal court review of federal constitutional rights. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:08 pm
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005) stated "Williamson County's state-litigation rule has created some real anomalies... [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:21 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323, 350-52 (2005)? [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323, 350-52 (2005). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
City and County of San Francisco, in which he recites case law on what constitutes a crime of violence (bonus points for whoever is first to spot Kozinski’s special tweak of a certain liberal lion on the Ninth Circuit… just leave it in the comments section): “[W]e often disagree. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:21 am
City and County of San Francisco that the Williamson County rule is "mistaken" due to its lack of doctrinal underpinning and incoherent effect on federal jurisdiction? [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 6:20 pm
City and County of San Francisco that such a rule lacks any legitimate doctrinal basis and causes tremendous and unintended jurisdictional confusion? [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
City and County of San Francisco, 2010 WL 431790 (9th Cir. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
On September 18, 2014, the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) petitioned the California Supreme Court for review. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:00 am
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 863. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 11:09 am
City and County of San Francisco that such a rule is "mistaken" due to its lack of doctrinal underpinning and preclusive effect on federal jurisdiction? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985). [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:36 pm
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005) four Justices noted the ripeness rules of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:40 am
City and County of San Francisco that such a rule is "mistaken" due to its lack of doctrinal underpinning and preclusive effect on federal jurisdiction? [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), four Justices agreed Williamson County produces absurd results and denies federal court review of federal constitutional rights. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm
Today I'm attending the 2022 Golden State Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Institute at the Julia Morgan Ballroom in San Francisco. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005). [read post]
