Search for: "Johnson v. Health Care Service Corporation"
Results 41 - 60
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
There is no dispute that Lindquist personally bought the phone, pays for its monthly service, and sometimes uses it in the course of his job.Nissen v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am
Ostendorf and making explicit findings on each factor -- Where counsel is involved in conduct to be sanctioned Kozel analysis is required before entering judicial default, and failure to do so is, by itself, basis for remandDOROTHY CHAPPELLE, CALVIN JOHNSON and EVELYN WILLIAMS, Appellants, v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
Schwaegler which are in dispute and not the subject of this hearing, Foss has paid maintenance and cure to Hedges since soon after the injury pursuant to its maritime obligation to pay maintenance and cure to a seaman injured in the service of its vessel. 12. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am
R (Lumsdon & Ors) v Legal Services Board, heard 16 March 2015. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:19 am
By Marjorie Johnson, J.D. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am
R (Lumsdon & Ors) v Legal Services Board, heard 16 March 2015. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:33 pm
Home health aides are an expanding area of employment as the population becomes older and people turn to in-home care as opposed to institutional care. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
Hobby Lobby, the Court held – in an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito – that (at least as applied to closely held corporations) the regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services requiring employers to provide their female employees with no-cost access to contraception violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:32 am
” or constituted health care fraud. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:01 pm
” It could conceive of no circumstances when calling a subordinate that name would be acceptable (Johnson v STRIVE East Harlem Employment Group). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Sun Life and Health Insurance Company v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:06 am
HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION, No. 11-0652 Opinion of the Court I suppose this is one way to (ever so slightly) bring down the cost of federal health programs. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:51 pm
Keck, et al., No. 3:12-cv-02088 (D.S.C.), filed on July 25, 2012 by KV against the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services challenging the latter’s prior authorization policy favoring compounded HPC formulations over Makena® (ongoing); (3) K-V Pharmaceutical Co., et al. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
Justice Johnson, writing for four other Justices (and for Justice Willett in part) concluded that Texas law “creates a rebuttable presumption that a patient’s claims against a physician or health care provider based on facts implicating the defendant’s conduct during the patient’s care, treatment, or confinement are HCLCs. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
Justice Johnson wrote for a majority of six, concluding that the court of appeals should have heard the immunity argument even though it had not been presented before. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Celanese Corporation v. [read post]
