Search for: "Johnson v. Smith*" Results 1 - 20 of 1,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
Smith cited “the lack of certainty of the pathologic diagnosis of ovarian cancer versus a peritoneal mesothelioma in epidemiologic studies” as making the epidemiology uninterpretable and any conclusions impossible.[14] Against this backdrop of evidence, I took a look at what Johnson & Johnson had to say about the occupational asbestos epidemiology in its briefs, in section “B. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 5:01 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals decided Johnson v Smith on November 20, 2007, giving us yet another lesson in how and when an acknowledgment of parentage may be revoked. [read post]