Search for: "Johnson v. State of Louisiana*" Results 1 - 20 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Johnson granted a temporary restraining order against state laws designed to take effect after Roe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:02 am by Brian A. Comer
“After the judge makes a determination as to damages, we will consider our options,” Panico said in his statement.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am by Charles Johnson
If you are facing either federal or state drug charges, call Federal Drug Crimes Lawyer Charles Johnson now at (713) 222-7577. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:08 am by Brian A. Comer
Risperdal is different from other antipsychotic medicines and “doctors needed to know that,” he added.Jurors will begin deliberating the case tomorrow.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Rory Little
  The Court decided, by a vote of seven to one, that last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 6:50 am
Tureau Inns of Court, will present a panel discussion commemorating the 75th anniversary of the seminal United States Supreme Court opinion in Powell v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
This is then tested based on an analysis of twelve factors known as the Johnson factors, which was first formulated in Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:45 am by Bill Raftery
The Louisiana Constitution provides (Article V, Sections 4 & 6) Section 4. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:46 pm by Nora Demleitner
United States, in which the court declared Johnson to be retroactive, and on Montgomery v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:09 pm by Nora Demleitner
United States, in which the court declared Johnson to be retroactive, and on Montgomery v. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]