Search for: "Johnson v. Summer" Results 61 - 80 of 393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2021, 4:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Many legal scholars have written on this issue but none as much as Chief Justice Marshall in Johnson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 7:01 am by Sara Bjerg Moller
But neither of the two missions the transatlantic alliance undertook in Afghanistan—the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and Resolute Support—were Article V missions. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
That’s a lot, but adding $100 billion to the Sarin and Summers estimate of the current tax gap ($630 billion) does not come close to $1 trillion. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
Customs and Border Protection, whose function is supposedly to monitor the U.S. border, were used to surveil protests against police violence in over 15 cities in the summer of 2020, many hundreds of miles from the border. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
Customs and Border Protection, whose function is supposedly to monitor the U.S. border, were used to surveil protests against police violence in over 15 cities in the summer of 2020, many hundreds of miles from the border. [read post]
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm by Joshua Braver
And during the Black Lives Matter protests this summer, then-Attorney General William Barr voiced support for charging certain “rioters” at the protests using the seditious conspiracy statute. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm by Ellis Cose
During its first summer, the ACLU denounced the lynching of three Black men in Duluth, Minnesota who had allegedly raped a 17-year-old white girl. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm by Katie Barlow
The Washington Post reported that Barrett previously tested positive for COVID-19 over the summer but has since recovered. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by CMS
In this case comment, David Bridge and Jessica Foley, both solicitor-advocates within the CMS litigation & arbitration team, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court earlier this summer in the matter of Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31, which concerned whether the rule against reflective loss bars creditors of a company from claiming directly against a third party for asset-stripping the company. [read post]