Search for: "Johnson v. U. S. Secret Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
Fox v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:48 am
Over in Azerbaijan, members of a suspected terrorist group with connections to Iran’s secret service have been arrested, reports the AP. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:22 am
That testimony appears from the transcript of the hearing as clear and unequivocal; the testimony revealed that the investigation by the Secret Service had located two witnesses, including Quinney's own brother, who said the Defendant was the printer of the counterfeit currency. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Partially an advertisement for IBM’s Watson data analytics and insight services (“cognitive engine”), the presentation gave a taste of things to come for pharmaceutical companies and their advisers. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
(In case you’re wondering, the remaining five are Microsoft, Pfizer, Exxon-Mobil, Johnson & Johnson and ADP.) [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:52 am
Don’t they have the Secret Service there? [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 10:18 pm
In course of this judgment, certain parameters were laid down for consideration before jurisdiction u/s 97A could be established, viz. that the Defendants were service providers, that the users and/or the operators of the websites infringe the copyright of the Claimants by using the Defendant’s services and that the Defendants had actual knowledge of their services being thus used. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
First, he argues that his service as President from 2017 to 2021 did not bring him within the operation of Section 3 in the first instance because Section 3 does not expressly refer to the President and because the presidency is not an office “of the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm
For example, #4 on the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act’s Top 26 Advertising No-No’s List is “[u]sing deceptive representations or designations of geographic origin in connection with goods or services. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Gravel v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
Cachia Caruana had filed a complaint accusing him of using the Secret Service against those who did not agree with him. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:44 pm
Reproductive Health Services claims that the Thirteenth Amendment guarantees a woman’s right to abortion. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
This is a libel action brought by the Ukrainian President over allegations that a secret six figure sum was paid to arrange talks between him and Donald Trump. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
RT: Why is the paper about “IP” and not patent & © with a trade secret chaser? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
The Ninth Circuit's Young v. [read post]
