Search for: "Joiner v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
”[9] The Reporter’s example of PCBs and small lung cancer was an obvious reference to the Joiner case, in which the Supreme Court held that the trial judge had properly excluded causation opinions. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am by Schachtman
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997); Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am by Schachtman
” The authors fail to mention that this dictum was abandoned in Joiner, and that it is specifically rejected by statute, in the 2000 revision to the Federal Rule of Evidence 702. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
In the Paoli Railroad yard litigation, plaintiffs claimed injuries and increased risk of future cancers from environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Indeed, kids do a lot of copying that isn’t even noticed as copying: trace the letters to learn how to write; instruction where we have students watch then do, which is to say copy, then teach, which is to say have others copy you; perhaps this can often be distinguished as processes v. outputs, but copying letters is copying outputs, not just tasks. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am by Wally Zimolong
 Building and Construction Trades Council of Metropolitan District v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am by Wally Zimolong
 Building and Construction Trades Council of Metropolitan District v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:24 am by anbrandon
All of this is filtered through a natural bias toward upholding convictions, resulting in a legal objection that is difficult to apply and a claim on appeal that seems unlikely to prevail.Yesterday's unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
(Rabbi) Daniel Thau Teitelbaum has the distinction of having been excluded in case that went to the United States Supreme Court (Joiner), but Shira Kramer,3 Richard Clapp, and Peter F. [read post]