Search for: "Jones v. English" Results 1 - 20 of 393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm by Eleonora Rosati
The High Court judgment did not therefore resolve the question of whether s 9(3) is an exception to the originality requirement.A second occasion where the English Courts have considered 9(3) arose last year, in THJ Systems v Sheridan, a copyright dispute arising in the context of the breakdown in a business partnership. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am by CMS
Lord Leggatt, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lady Rose made the majority decision. [read post]
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 12:50 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The first scenario is based on Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick, which was decided by the High Court of Australia in 2002. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
Kevin Kelly and his girlfriend Regina Jones went to a Halloween party at the Rustic Café in Old Lyme, Connecticut into 2018. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm by Frank Cranmer
  Quick links Peter Frost, Chris Jones and Josh Peters, Lexology: UK: EAT provides welcome guidance on proportionality in belief/freedom of expression cases: on Higgs v Farmor’s School. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
History in Mother Jones and, with Jonathan Capehart, in WaPo. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am by admin
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
(Fourth issue) The Supreme Court’s judgment  Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Kitchin, with whom Lord Hodge agreed, gave the majority judgment, with Lord Carnwath dissenting in part. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:16 am by Administrator
Jones et al., 2023 ONSC 820 (CanLII) [25] At paragraphs 79 and 82 of Derenzis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy Perspective has published an article on Driver v CPS [2022] EWHC 2500 KB, arguing that the case is illustrative of a set of facts where the legitimate starting point of a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of a criminal investigation at pre-charge stage under English law can be can be departed from. [read post]