Search for: "Jones v. League" Results 61 - 80 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
So for instance, in the 2008 FAPL v QC Leisure litigation it was held that inclusion of the Premier League anthem was not essential for the purpose of showing the player line-up.... compulsive twitterer by nightWould, say, the tweeting of film extracts from football matches' topical moments qualify as news reporting? [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:36 pm by admin
Chapter V explores sports issues in private litigation, including standing, class actions, injunctions, and damages. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm by anbrandon
But that panel's opinion today in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
 Two differently constituted Courts of Appeal for England and Wales, within a very short period, appear to have come up with quite different approaches to how to treat an appeal in which they take issue with the trial judge's findings of fact, one case being Lumos and the other being Okotoks v Fine & Country (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 am by David Urban
  (The Supreme Court in fact rejected a rule of personal liability for retaliation in Jones v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:27 am by Ken Shigley
Jones, 260 Ga.App. 791, 581 S.E.2d 360 (2003), in which Braves star Andruw Jones threw a ball that went into the stands striking a spectator. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of AmericaDocket: 11-1139Issue(s): Whether the First Amendment, as interpreted by this Court in Jones v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am by INFORRM
The Defendant pleaded justification, and in mid-2010, applied that an order for service out of the jurisdiction be set aside on the grounds, derived from Jameel (Youssef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc. [2005] QB 946,  that the Tweet did not constitute a real and substantial tort within the jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The Defendant pleaded justification, and in mid-2010, applied that an order for service out of the jurisdiction be set aside on the grounds, derived from Jameel (Youssef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc. [2005] QB 946,  that the Tweet did not constitute a real and substantial tort within the jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Supp. 1014, 1043 (S.D.N.Y. 1993), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 52 F.3d 1122, 1134 (2d Cir. 1995) Jones v. [read post]