Search for: "Jones v. Murphy"
Results 41 - 60
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Next is Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 8:55 pm
Gasper LaRosa of Jones Day, Brian Murphy of Haug Partners LLP, and Dorothy Whelan, Fish & Richardson, PC will analyze the case law, and the resulting changes in PTAB practice, since the Federal Circuit's decision in Applications in Internet Time (AIT) v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
None of these three – David Cortman, Noel Francisco (who argued cases for Jones Day and as the U.S. solicitor general) or William Messenger – was mentioned in previous figures. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am
Ohio’s solicitor general, Eric Murphy, argued four cases. [read post]
21 May 2018, 9:53 am
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1, 33–34 (1937))). [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:03 am
” At FiveThirtyEight, Ty Schalter looks at the practical consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Murphy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
” At Bloomberg, Christopher Palmeri reports that, depending on how the Supreme Court rules in Murphy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:05 am
At Bloomberg Law, Patrick Gregory discusses how the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:12 pm
Murphy (a co-inventor of the patent-in-suit). [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm
Murphy Oil USA No. 16-307. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:41 am
After that, it is possible to identify Jones v Saudi Arabia. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
Herzig, A Diachronic Approach to Bob Jones: Religious Tax Exemptions After Obergefell, 92 IND. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:16 pm
See 3M Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am
Securing the Homeland in the Post-Post 9/11 EraJohn Kelly, Secretary of Homeland Security Moderator: Pete Williams, Justice Correspondent, NBC News No Room for Error: Advising the President on Homeland Security and CounterterrorismThomas Bossert, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Moderator: David Sanger, Chief Washington Correspondent, The New York Times One Off or Turning Point: The Airstrike in SyriaJane Harman, President,… [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
State v. [read post]
