Search for: "Jones v. Sullivan"
Results 1 - 20
of 178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:27 pm
Andersen Jones, RonNell and West, Sonja, Supreme Court Ideology and the Press (March 15, 2024). [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
The conviction of Rausing aside, however, since R v Hunter in 1974 there appear to have been nine fully-reported cases of the offence in England and Wales: R v Swindell (1981) 3 Cr App R (S) 255; R v Parry and McLean (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 470; R v Skinner (Patrick and Ian) (1993) 14 Cr App R (S) 115; R v Godward [1998] 1 Cr App R (S) 385; R v Lang (Jack Thomas) [2001] EWCA Crim 2690, [2002] 2 Cr App R… [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Sullivan, which holds that public figures cannot recover for defamation consistent with the First Amendment unless they demonstrate the press acted recklessly or knowing their statements were false. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
While both Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch have criticized Sullivan and called for it to be overruled, it seems unlikely that the court will grant review; just last term, the court relied on Sullivan in holding that threats could not be prosecuted under the First Amendment absent proof they were made in reckless disregard that the listener would be placed in fear. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 712–13 (1997) (Breyer, J., dissenting))) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:47 pm
RonNell Andersen Jones appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Jones. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
Dominion v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
Jones that the president should not be subject to a sexual-harassment lawsuit while he was in office. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 2:30 am
Comm’rs v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:05 pm
ShareOn Tuesday, the justices will hear argument in Jones v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
Jones,[13] if the story is sufficiently focused on Pennsylvania—for instance, if it expressly discusses Norton and Glenn as being Pennsylvania residents saying things about each other in Pennsylvania—then Pennsylvania may well have personal jurisdiction over the lawsuit against Fox. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 10:15 am
Sullivan & A. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 9:28 am
Wash.) in Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
From Sullivan v. [read post]
