Search for: "Josh Chafetz"
Results 61 - 80
of 164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Josh Chafetz, Cornell Law School, although as of this summer my colleague at Georgetown Law, has posted Congressional Overspeech, which is forthcoming in the Fordham Law Review:Political theater. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:02 pm
Adler, a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law; Josh Chafetz, a professor at Cornell Law School; Simon F. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The court acknowledged that it has in fact resolved such disputes, including one involving a Senate subpoena to President Nixon during Watergate, but then, quoting my colleague Josh Chafetz, decided to disregard those precedents on the ground that “courts have never offered a persuasive reason why a congressional subpoena to an executive branch official” gives rise to a proper case.That is a truly stunning move. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm
Is the desire to be even stricter simply another sign of the pathological way we treat our presidents as father figures and our strange incorporation of Josh Chafetz's insight that since impeachment=tyrannicide, and therefore paracide, it should become almost literally unthinkable? [read post]
The problematics of impeachment (I): The specific problems of Charles Black's take on the presidency
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
The implicit reason, of course, is that it would be the equivalent of parricide (and not simply, as Josh Chafetz suggested some years ago in an excellent article, a useful substitute for tyrannicide). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:53 pm
Josh Chafetz (Cornell) has argued the same, and I'm sure others have as well.) [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
What is “executive privilege”? [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
More.Check out the British North American Legislative Database, 1758-1867, an impressive open-access resource created by Elizabeth Mancke and her team at the University of New BrunswickThis New York Times op-ed by Josh Chafetz (Cornell Law), on the impeachment process and congressional "hardball," includes some interesting legal history. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Below the fold are the results of the 2019-2020 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 9:40 am
Hasen (UC Irvine), Josh Chafetz, (Cornell Law School), Henry Olsen (Ethics & Public Policy Center & Washington Post), Matthew Glassman (Senior Fellow, Government Affairs Institute, Georgetown University), and David Karol (Panel Chair, University of Maryland, College Park). [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 6:48 pm
Conventional legal scholarship, such as that written by Josh Chafetz, David E. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 6:48 pm
Conventional legal scholarship, such as that written by Josh Chafetz, David E. [read post]
22 May 2019, 3:02 am
Josh Chafetz on whether the current Congressional subpoena fights are really that different from politics of the past [Jonathan Adler] Calm, down-the-middle analysis of the issues raised by the Mueller report [Cato Institute chairman Bob Levy] “Mercedes Goes To Court To Get Background Use Of Public Murals In Promotional Pics Deemed Fair Use” [Timothy Geigner] Bizarro sovereign-citizen notions are found in the background of more than a few serious financial fraud… [read post]
5 May 2019, 2:30 pm
[Coverage Opinions] * Jonathan Adler flags a thoughtful debate between Michael McConnell and Josh Chafetz on the battle over subpoenas between President Trump and Congressional Democrats. [read post]
3 May 2019, 5:58 am
As a leading scholar of the subject, Cornell law professor Josh Chafetz, has written, "most disputes between the executive and legislative branches over information have historically been settled by negotiation and accommodation. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:17 pm
And so, while it’s easy to write off Trump’s tweet, it’s worth considering Cornell Law professor Josh Chafetz’s suggestion that statement should be read as “part of an ongoing effort to shift the constitutional debate around president-checking mechanisms. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:13 am
Democratic majorities seeking to pass a transformative election law statute may run up against a welter of blocking ploys, from filibusters to secret holds to denials of committee quorums, unless and until they themselves resort to constitutional hardball.One complication here is the possibility that hardball tactics, even if used in the service of anti-hardball ends, become less effective in our constitutional culture precisely to the extent that they are acknowledged as such (a subject… [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
One complication here is the possibility that hardball tactics, even if used in the service of anti-hardball ends, become less effective in our constitutional culture precisely to the extent that they are acknowledged as such (a subject Josh Chafetz and I have explored). [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:00 pm
Josh Chafetz, in Congress’s Constitution, urges Congress to rehabilitate its underused but important nonlegislative powers. [read post]
