Search for: "Judge Development Corp. v. Bank of New York" Results 61 - 80 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2015, 3:05 pm by Joshua Davey
NDG Financial Corp. et al., case number 1:15-cv-5211, filed in July 2015 in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit:  As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:54 pm
"  In reaching her decision, the judge cited last year's Supreme Court ruling in Alice Corp v CLS Bank stating that "while the very idea of allowing multiple-device playback may have been novel at the time of invention, the second step of the Alice/Mayo test requires more than a novel ideal - it requires a specific application of that idea, to ensure that all embodiments of the idea (even if novel) are not preempted. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
TransUNION CORP. http://t.co/nnmreTY09y -> Hybrid click wrap enforced by New York court in Nicosia v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
OneWest Bank, FSB, No. 12 C 6380, 2013 WL 212926 (N.D. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
Gerard Magliocca (Panel Moderator) With the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
D&O Insurance Funds Entire $139 Million News Corp. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
In the thick of the holiday season, 40 million Target shoppers were greeted with distressing news: Hackers had managed to steal credit card and debit-card information from Target stores nationwide. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
 Software companies look for bugs late in the development process and knowingly package and ship buggy software with impunity. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in June 2012, Central District of California Judge R. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Tropeano v Dorman, 441 F3d 69, 77-78 [1st Cir 2006] ["Business activities which may continue indefinitely are not 'particular' in nature and do not constitute particular undertakings"]; Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d at 86; Fischer v Fischer, 197 SW3d 98, 104 [Ky 2006], quoting Girard Bank v Haley, 460 Pa 237, 244, 332 A2d 443, 447 [1975]; Miami Subs Corp. v Murray Family Trust, 142 NH 501, 509, 703 A2d 1366, 1371 [1997]; Harshman… [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 1:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, on July 12, 2010, Southern District of New York Judge Sidney Stein substantially denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the bondholders’ action. [read post]