Search for: "Judge Laird" Results 61 - 80 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2007, 8:16 am
This disclosure came the same day I sat in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in chilly Cincinnati, where a three-judge panel (Judges Alice Batchelder, Ronald Gilman and Julia Gibbons) heard oral arguments in the ACLU v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:40 am
  The judge then analyzed the issues of ripeness and standing, in that order. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:50 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Which means if you’re a probate lawyer, you should assume you’re probably stuck with whatever your probate judge rules. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 2:47 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 96793 (SD NY, Sept. 10, 2010), a New York federal district judge rejected a Jewish inmate's free exercise and RLUIPA claims that an officer refused to transport him to one religious service and that his Kosher meals were repetitive, improperly handled, sometimes forgotten, and not provided in the clinic.In Laird v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:28 am by Jonathan Hafetz
The district judge found these harms insufficient to confer standing. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 7:44 am
Conversely, local judges would really enjoy the opportunity to sit with Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:14 am by Danielle Citron
 Questions about the Court’s contemporary recusal practice date back to Chief Justice Rehnquist’s decision to participate in the Laird v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 11:19 am by admin
Ehrenberg, “Less Evidence, Better Knowledge,” 2 McGill L.J. 173 (2015); Laird C. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am by Schachtman
Judge Johnson’s judicial handiwork received non-deferential appellate review from a three-judge panel of the Appellate Division, which reversed the exclusion of Kornbluth and Madigan. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 9:23 am by Michael Lowe
See, “Court systems rethink the use of financial bail, which some say penalizes the poor,” written by Lorelei Laird and published by the ABA Journal on April 1, 2016. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The mere recital of that provision shows how much is left to the discretion of the judge reacting to a recusal plea. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
Laird, which Mitchell invoked in his argument.In my next post, I’ll address the most important issue emerging from oral argument—namely, the Justices’ concern that there’s something constitutionally troubling about states using their election ballots to in some sense “enforce” Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to prospective federal officers (the President, in particular)—in contrast to states enforcing Section 3… [read post]