Search for: "Judicial Ethics Opinion 2010-6"
Results 61 - 80
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
House Jan. 6 Committee Votes to Hold Former Trump DOJ Official in Criminal Contempt MSN – Jacqueline Alemany (Washington Post) | Published: 12/1/2021 The House select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
He points out to contributory factors such as false accusations, misleading police investigative work, inept defence counsel, misperceptions by Crown prosecutors of their role, factual assumption of an accused’s guilt by actors in the criminal justice system, community pressure for a conviction, inadequate identification evidence, perjury, false confessions, inadequate or misinterpreted forensic evidence, judicial bias, poor presentation of an appellate case, and difficulty in… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
He points out to contributory factors such as false accusations, misleading police investigative work, inept defence counsel, misperceptions by Crown prosecutors of their role, factual assumption of an accused’s guilt by actors in the criminal justice system, community pressure for a conviction, inadequate identification evidence, perjury, false confessions, inadequate or misinterpreted forensic evidence, judicial bias, poor presentation of an appellate case, and difficulty in… [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 9:16 am
Starting in 2009 and 2010, states began issuing a spate of ethics opinions on lawyers’ use of the cloud. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:18 am
Harm § 11 (2010). 5. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
He certainly was quick to pronounce ethical judgments upon others, especially anyone in manufacturing industry, or any scientist who served as an expert witness opposite him. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
The AG rendered two important opinions which were largely followed by the CJEU in the Schrems judgment. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 10:46 am
Professor Tong has been developing his thought in part in a essay site that was started in 2010. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Trump attorney Kenneth Chesebro contended Thomas would be “our only chance to get a favorable judicial opinion by Jan. 6, which might hold up the Georgia count in Congress. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
Legislation allowing marriage between any two people passed on May 6, 2009. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
In the 2010 census, people identifying themselves as white comprised 75.1% of the population. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
In the 2010 census, people identifying themselves as white comprised 75.1% of the population. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
At least one ethical opinion that we've found also rejects Hall's no-coaching rationale for prohibiting in-deposition conferences.On the other hand, in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
”5 These conceptions are at base the product of applied ideology.6 States often evidence their ruling ideologies in their core documents—constitutions, germinal judicial opinion, and the like.7 In the social sciences, including the academic study of law,8 the role of ideology9— its deployment in the service of autonomous “fact” deeply camouflaged within the ideological presumptions of the systems in whose service they are… [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
That means that sometimes you will have an opinion or produce an insight with respect to which there may be objection or disagreement. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm
Never before have I had to produce such voluminous and sensitive material in order to be permitted to testify. 6. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:23 am
I am delighted to announce that Concurring Opinions will be hosting a symposium next Monday and Tuesday on What Difference Representation? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The prospect of going to court to obtain a judgment (which, in those days, was also unlikely to be published) was hardly an attractive one, and given recent opinions about the legal system, would be of even less value today. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
After Wang, some courts moved beyond the two-part test to consider the policy implications of the requested disqualification.[6] Some of the policy considerations that have been advanced and been factored into judicial decisions whether to disqualify an expert witness include: protecting freedom of contract, and the consultant’s right to pursue a livelihood, preventing “sham” retentions to set up later disqualification, especially when there is a limited… [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
While I doubt the FTC could have confidently taken a strong stand on the legality of competitive keyword advertising in the aftermath of the Second Circuit’s 2009 Rescuecom opinion, the jurisprudential dust has settled a lot since then. [read post]
