Search for: "Justice v. Mitchell"
Results 41 - 60
of 901
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:03 am
The South Carolina Supreme Court decided Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:50 am
-V- DANIELS, MITCHELL E. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:14 pm
Barry Mitchell & Julian V. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 7:09 am
One of his great writings is his concurring opinion in the case of Laugh It Off Promotions CC v South African Breweries International (Finance) BV, [2005] ZACC 7, in which he posed [...]More at Beyond parody: Miss World and South Lanarkshire on Jonathan Mitchell QC. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:30 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:29 pm
Mitchell is one of the chosen few that will be heard by the justices in the coming term. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
SPOILER ALERT: If you’re reading this post to find out what the Justices and counsel had to say about the “derivative sovereign immunity” question Wednesday in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
In Ortiz v United States, 585 U. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:28 am
In 2018, Mitchell sought to reopen his post-conviction proceedings in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:24 am
Supreme Court case of Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 1:58 pm
In this denial of a petition for rehearing of a habeas denial, Nos. 01-3250/3300 Poindexter v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 3:35 pm
She files suit over these injuries in 2019.Justice Yegan is right that this lawsuit is barred by the one-year statute of limitations for medical negligence. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 7:43 pm
In Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:59 pm
The case, State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
Late last month, the Supreme Court decided Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 7:02 am
Kavanaugh joined, in Mitchell v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:37 pm
No thanks at all go out to Justice Fields and this opinion from this afternoon.The new term is "degloved" -- a word that I had never heard until today. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 11:19 am
"An excerpt is reposted below, and you can read the full article here.Professor Mitchell's characteristically thoughtful and incisive comment makes many important points.1 He is right in saying that Atkins v Virginia2 and Thompson v Oklahoma3 fit the modernization model better than Roper v Simmons4 or Kennedy v Louisiana.5 I also agree with Professor Mitchell that a modernization approach gives political actors an incentive to… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
In Mitchell v Mitchell, No 144959 the Court held that it was not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by the Court. [read post]
