Search for: "KAREN v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 61 - 80
of 213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Pharmaceutical Pricing Jaime King, University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Burden of Federalism: Challenges to State Attempts at Controlling Prescription Drug Costs Marc Rodwin, Suffolk University Law School, Controlling Pharmaceutical Prices: What the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
The features Vorder Bruegge matched might be common in plaid shirts, making them of little value for identifying the garment, said Karen Kafadar, chair of the statistics department at the University of Virginia. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:38 am
Another look comes from Karen Lovitch at The National Law Review. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
United States California has implemented new blockchain legislation, a move which has drawn commentary from the Hunton Andrews Kurth Blog. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
The first case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
The first case is United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:27 am
Janus v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
Karen R. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
ARCHER, KAREN ARCHER BALL, AND SHERRI ARCHER v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 7:57 am
A federal judge previously dismissed the lawsuit in March 2017, Jonee Fonseca et al v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore of the Northern District of California will consider whether a process should be established to determine over time which cases remain validly sealed and which should be released to the public. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:08 am
”The brief cites the Comedy III Productions, Inc. v Gary Saderup, Inc., where the California Court of Appeals found that the right of publicity “has the potential of censoring significant expression by suppressing alternative versions of celebrity images that are iconoclastic, irreverent, or otherwise attempt to redefine the celebrity’s meaning. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
Benisek v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Karen B. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 6:45 am
The State Bar of California made a small change to how it calculates the passing rate of bar exam test-takers. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 5:24 am
California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971). [read post]
