Search for: "Keegan v. United States" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Accordingly, the respondent’s determination was not arbitrary or capricious and should not be disturbed (see Matter of O’Brien v Keegan, 87 NY2d 436, 439; Matter of Sarro v Smith, 8 AD3d at 395). [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee dismissed plaintiffs’ claims as time-barred. [read post]