Search for: "Kennedy v. State Compensation Director" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 8:00 am by Will McAllister
Kennedy Thompson 96,000   275,012   0 0 371,012   *Compensation amount reflects fees earned through retirement date. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:07 am
Hardiman, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Saturday, May 8, 2021 Tags: Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Director liability, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Nevada, Securities litigation, State law March to the Beat of Your Own Drummer: Amazon’s Executive Compensation Practices Posted by Howard Berkower, McCarter & English LLP, on Sunday, May 9, 2021 … [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
[Correction: An earlier version of this post stated that Kennedy’s opinion in Murr v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Posted by Salvatore Graziano, Michael Mathai, and Kate Aufses, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, on Sunday, February 3, 2019 Tags: Exchange Act, Institutional Investors, SEC, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Shareholder rights, State law, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts CEO Pay Trends Around the Globe Posted by Andrew Ludwig, Equilar Inc., on Sunday, February 3, 2019 … [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy’s second opinion is in Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
These three cases, taken together, are nothing less than a revolution in free exercise clause jurisprudence, tying the hands of the states when it comes to regulating private schools-- all done with no originalist support.In Kennedy v. [read post]