Search for: "Kent v. Kent" Results 161 - 180 of 2,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Birdthistle (Chicago-Kent College of Law) and Quinn Curtis (University of Virginia), on Monday, December 6, 2021 Tags: Conflicts of interest, DOL, ERISA, Fiduciary rule, Institutional Investors, Investment advisers, Investor protection, Mutual funds, Prudence, Retirement plans, Securities regulation U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 11:27 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
With the usual Kent Brockman caution that "only time will tell," yesterday's argument probably means that Roe v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 8:48 am by Larry
The underlying dispute is whether such seats are classifiable as seats of Heading 9401 (duty free) or as bicycle accessories of 8714.99.8000, which are subject to a 10% rate of duty.The CAFC opinion in Kent International, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 12:41 pm by familoo
It was implemented as a result of the decision of Sir James Munby (as he then was) in Kent CC v B (RE B (A CHILD) (DISCLOSURE) [2004] EWHC 411 (Fam) [2004] 2 FLR 142) to render lawful that which Munby had said was a regular but inadvertent contempt precluded by s12 Administration of Justice Act 1960: disclosure between professionals in furtherance of child protection. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
An 1874 law banned arms carrying on election day in Kent County. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Kent Police have apologised to journalist photographer Andy Aitchison for his arrest while covering a Covid-hit asylum centre in Kent, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2017]; Escape… [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Giles Peaker
And now Schadenfreude… Ashford Borough Council v Wilson (2021) EWHC 2542 (QB) Fergus Wilson, (for yes, it is he), has quite a track record of legal proceedings related to him behaving badly. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:30 am by Christopher Walker
Drawing on the work of Michael Asimow, Kent Barnett, and others, we explained that the new world is more diverse and varied. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Doubt was cast upon this practice in early 2021 in a CMC in Sandoz v BMS[7][2021] EWHC 393 (Pat) (Ch) and Teva v BMS where Mellor J observed that the practice of listing the trial before the CMC might well be doing things the wrong way round , and lead to parties jumping the queue to get their trial listed whilst others completed their pre-CMC formalities. [read post]