Search for: "Khan v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
“In a post Roe v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:30 pm
Khan v. the United Kingdom and Onur v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:11 am
Caplan, Arbitrator Challenges at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Loretta Malintoppi & Andrea Carlevaris, Challenges of Arbitrators, Lessons from the ICC Gregory J. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm
PSKS, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 vote to overrule the long-lived rule in Dr. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
United States, 370 U.S. 294 (1962). 5 H.R. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:43 am
Al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 1:09 pm
Branch v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:16 pm
The Court's analysis in United States v Khan, United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Friday's Second Circuit decision in Khan v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:00 am
To this end, the defendants, assisted by others in the United States and Pakistan, conspired to provide and provided material support to the Pakistani Taliban by soliciting, collecting and transferring money from the United States to supporters of the Pakistani Taliban, primarily using bank accounts and wire transfer services in the United States and Pakistan. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:12 pm
The scope ofthis power is broad: the government may detain any individual “engaged in hostilities … against the United States,” who “purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners,” or who “is part of the Taliban, al-Qaida, or associated forces. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
According to the court, Khan’s contentions were wholly speculative and conclusory, and, therefore, are insufficient to satisfy the burden of demonstrating irreparable injury.Kahn also argued that if he were to be out of work for an extended period, he would have to return to Australia and would never be able to obtain United States citizenship. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:50 am
Khan v. the United Kingdom). [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
" Boren,807 F.3d at 104 (quoting Khan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
While a few regulatory decisions are still outstanding, the Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard merger review process now comes down to the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:26 am
For example, in Khan v Government of the United States of America, Mr Khan failed to convince the High Court that the United States justice system was inherently unfair. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Taha &Sohaib Khan, Charity Disparity: The Challenge of Applying Religious Law on Zakat in the United States, (Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2018).Michael A. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:54 am
Facebook, Inc., available at: gov.uscourts.dcd.224921.73.0.pdf (courtlistener.com) & Opinion in State of New York et. al. v. [read post]
