Search for: "King Enterprises, Inc. v. the United States" Results 41 - 60 of 120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am by Barry Sookman
I recently had the privilege of speaking about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at the Fordham 24th Annual Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference, a stellar international IP conference. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
This suggestion appears to confuse the frequentist enterprise for evaluating evidence on the basis of statistical measures of the probability of observing at least as great a departure from expected in a sample rather than attempting to affixing a probability to the population parameter. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
United States (seven). [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by Stone Law, P.C.
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by admin
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by Stone Law, P.C.
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by admin
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm by admin
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
The 2nd Circuit opinion in Kirtsaeng relied heavily on Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The 2nd Circuit opinion in Kirtsaeng relied heavily on Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]