Search for: "King Enterprises, Inc. v. the United States" Results 81 - 100 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 1 February 2017, the Court of Appeal for Ontario handed down judgment in the case of The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360)   Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango)   Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm by Bexis
  At least one ethical opinion that we've found also rejects Hall's no-coaching rationale for prohibiting in-deposition conferences.On the other hand, in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Mogul Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a MSK Cargo/King Express (16-CA-24374; 348 NLRB No. 73) Harlingen, TX Nov. 8, 2006. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
United States, a “clear enough” — as opposed to, perhaps, a crystal clear — Chevron step one inquiry. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
The pressures of globalisation on the Japanese economy and intellectual property (Thomson Reuters Scientific)   Kenya BrandKenya: the task of branding Kenya’s exports (IP Kenya)   Lithuania Commission refuses PGI protection to Džiugas cheese, refuses PDO and PGI status for Germantas cheese (Class 46)   South Africa South Africa’s new Deputy President an IP expert (Afro-IP)   Spain Delimiting the border between trade mark and unfair… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
This suggestion appears to confuse the frequentist enterprise for evaluating evidence on the basis of statistical measures of the probability of observing at least as great a departure from expected in a sample rather than attempting to affixing a probability to the population parameter. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
 For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]