Search for: "King v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
In the case of Toronto Real Estate Board v Commissioner of Competition 2017 FCA 236 the Federal Court of appeal held that new consent was only need where information was used for a new purpose, not where it is distributed by new methods. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:08 am
In Peterson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 7:51 am
On appeal in Knight v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 7:51 am
On appeal in Knight v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:31 am
See Young v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:17 pm
Approved medical devices will be allowed on board, but only after additional screening is conducted. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 11:12 am
This post examines an opinion the Supreme Court of Ohioissued recently in a lawyer disciplinary proceeding: Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
Statement by Zeid Ra'ad al Hussein on the Opening of the 32nd Session of the UN Human Rights Council
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
The horror comes not merely from the subject of the listing but from its banality, the reduction of its components to ritualized actions whose principle interest in in its aggregation ("In Italia seicento e quaranta; In Alemagna duecento e trentuna; Cento in Francia, in Turchia novantuna; Ma in Ispagna son già mille e tre"), without regard to rank, value or societal impact ("E v'han donne d'ogni grado, D'ogni forma, d'ogni età"), and in… [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
This post examines an opinion recently issued by the Supreme Court of Ohio in a “[l]awyer disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
I may be wrong, but I suspect other courts will rely on this opinion.)The Supreme Court of Washington recently examined issues that arose from the state’s Public Records Act and a County Prosecutor who used “his private cell phone to conduct government business. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:01 pm
A recent decision by a Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents Reviewing Board, King v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
The EEOC says Magnolia’s prohibited discriminatory practices included only offering positions to certain applicants under the condition that the applicants pass a medical examination, as well as discharging or revoking job offers when it learned of or received records of prior medical conditions or current medical restrictions. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm
Ct. for King Cty.1987); Franze v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Even though M.G.L. c. 118E, s. 48 provides that the Director of the Board of Hearings “shall be responsible …for the training of referees,” it is unknown to the elder law bar whether such training has occurred regarding the details of federal Medicaid trust law, so hearing officers at the Board of Hearings may have been and may still be susceptible to being misled by the MassHealth Essay. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Even though M.G.L. c. 118E, s. 48 provides that the Director of the Board of Hearings “shall be responsible …for the training of referees,” it is unknown to the elder law bar whether such training has occurred regarding the details of federal Medicaid trust law, so hearing officers at the Board of Hearings may have been and may still be susceptible to being misled by the MassHealth Essay. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:08 am
In King v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
King Cole Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* The Future of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office: Board 28 to meetOn 11 February 2015, Board 28 of the European Patent Office will meet. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
In this post, she hosts another legal analysis of the situation, this time by Catarina Holtz, a former member of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office.* Life as a patent examiner according to the EPO - paid-for article in the New ScientistThe EPO has paid for an article promoting the career path of an EPO Examiner on the New Scientist. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
It is a matter of access, the CJEU lays down in Hejduk -- again explained by Eleonora.* Rihanna T-shirt: Court of Appeal says it's passing offAfter Birss J’s ruling, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales takes Rihanna under its umbrella, Eleonora reports.* "New career system" for EPO Examiners: take on extra workEPO Vice President Guillaume Minnoye invites EPO examiners to perform non-examining functions in additional to a normal… [read post]
