Search for: "King v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
I may be wrong, but I suspect other courts will rely on this opinion.)The Supreme Court of Washington recently examined issues that arose from the state’s Public Records Act and a County Prosecutor who used “his private cell phone to conduct government business. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
Francis Xavier v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Irving Selecoff arrived in Glasgow, Scotland, from New York City, on board the SS. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Indeed, New York Tax Law allows for tax commissioners “to examine or to cause to have examined…any books, papers, records or memoranda” of a corporation “bearing upon the matters to be required in the return. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Don’t give up (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco hopes to benefit from Iranian technology expertise (Afro-IP) Netherlands Medical aid association Eers [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Ct., Kings County] ), and warrant the denial of summary judgment sought by the party accused of adulterous behavior. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Irving Selikoff to examine 17 workers from the Paterson plant of Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UNARCO). [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
A recent example of this followed the Hillsborough disaster and the Taylor report which examined it. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Last month we examined some pre-Roman beginnings of modern admiralty doctrine, starting from pre-history through the Greek city states. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am
ANXIETY IS A DISEASE WITH A MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS.WHO AM I? [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (The Invent Blog), Impressive work on history of ‘Happy Birthday’ and copyright protection: (Innovationpartners), Gender and copyright: (Patry Copyright Blog) Events 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - New York: (Patent Docs), 1-2 July – C5 conference on intellectual asset management for high-tech industries – Paris: (c5-online.com), 2… [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
The Court has examined the concept of Public Interest Litigation as prevalent in other countries. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
The research examined whether a lobbyist’s perception of their own success was accurate, compared to legislative outcomes, and if their measure of their own success was in line with other lobbyists who worked on the same issues. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Techdirt), (Techdirt), Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General Biotech patent law: eleven key pending cases and future developments to watch: (Hal Wegner), (PatentDocs) Study by The Innovation Group highlights damaging intellectual property has been to biotech: (Techdirt), Drug regulatory agencies collaborate on counterfeits, new medical products: (Intellectual Property Watch), Canada: Health Canada releases summary report on industry consultations… [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
See, e.g., Jewett V. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
First, courts place a positive obligation on each party to identify all of the documents in their possession or control that may be “relevant†to issues in the litigation, and to produce each such document unless privilege is claimed over it.20 Second, lawyers are allowed to question a representative of each adverse party under oath â€" a process referred to as “examination for discoveryâ€. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
