Search for: "King v. Holder" Results 1 - 20 of 395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2011, 9:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
"Paul Clement and K&S represent the prison inmates seeking release in Brown v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
However: (1) the social benefit in having a truthful depiction of King's actual words would be much greater than the copyright owners' loss, and (2) it is not required that all four fair use factors weigh in favour of a finding of fair use, as recent judgments, eg Cariou v Prince [here] or Seltzer v Green Day [here], demonstrate. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Terry Hart
However, it was made in 1998, when the Court heard Quality King v L’anza, a case involving similar issues concerning the first sale doctrine and § 602. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by Stone Law, P.C.
The 2nd Circuit opinion in Kirtsaeng relied heavily on Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
The 2nd Circuit opinion in Kirtsaeng relied heavily on Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
The 2nd Circuit opinion in Kirtsaeng relied heavily on Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
The 2nd Circuit opinion in Kirtsaeng relied heavily on Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm by Frank Cranmer
 As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
King who joined the Supreme Court less than four years after King’s death. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 7:27 pm by Steve Kalar
Sure – despite the clear spirit of the recent Holder memo, discouraging such vindictive use of mand-mins. [read post]
The closest Supreme Court precedent is Quality King Distribs., Inc. v. [read post]