Search for: "King v. Murphy" Results 41 - 60 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYTorts Player Did Not Assume Risk of Being Hit in Face With a Bat by Coach Demonstrating a Technique Murphy v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 12:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Taylor, 694 F.3d 650, 655 (6th Cir.2012) (explaining that the service requirement is satisfiedby proper service of process, consent, waiver, or forfeitureby the defendant (first citing Murphy Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
| Book review: "Brandfather: John Murphy, The Man Who Invented Branding" | IP Summit 2016 (Second Part) | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:29 am by Douglas Melcher
 Then, in April 2011, a division of the Court of Appeals comprised of Judges Washington, Blackburne-Rigsby, and King decided Mazza v. [read post]