Search for: "Kingdon v. Kingdon"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2010, 3:25 am
In Kingdon v Kingdon [2010] EWCA Civ 1251, the Court of Appeal yesterday held that where an ancillary relief order is vitiated by material non-disclosure, the order does not necessarily have to be set aside.The facts: On 18 April 2005 the court had, by consent, made an order for ancillary relief between the parties, on a clean break basis. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:53 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) SK Slavia Praha-Fotbal AS v Debt Collect London Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1250 (04 November 2010) Bovis Homes Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1252 (04 November 2010) Kingdon v Kingdon [2010] EWCA Civ 1251 (04 November 2010) L-W (Children), Re [2010] EWCA Civ 1253 (04 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Acheampong, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:44 am
United Kingdom; Francis v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:10 am
In Children of the Kingdon v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 3:28 am
Natasha and I discuss the following family law news items from the last week: BASW rejects Loughton's comments on inter-racial adoption; Children and families charities call on Minister for protection against cuts; Family court service Cafcass criticised by MPs; the Court of Appeal cases of Re L-W (Children) and Kingdon v Kingdon; and Oil millionaire's ex-wife seeks higher divorce settlement.You can listen to the LoreCast here. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 1:10 pm
Axelrod and John V. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:21 pm
The supplemental brief statedThe Hawaiian sovereignty defense in this particular case stems from the fact that the Appellant stated he was a citizen of the Hawaiian Kingdon and not bound by the laws of the State of Hawaii and that the vehicle was registered with the Reinstated Hawaiian Kingdom....The essence of [Defendant's] Hawaiian sovereignty defense assertion is that the Kingdom of Hawaii exists as the only legal entity capable of allowing him to drive.Ultimately the defense was… [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 10:32 am
In British Columbia (Director of Civil Forfeiture) v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 7:25 pm
Pai Foundation v State of Karnataka [(2002) 8 SCC 481]. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:39 am
Glasberg & Associates; Cassi Pollreis, client of the Institute for Justice; Houston Stevens, plaintiff in Monroe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 2:05 am
Today’s ministerial statement justifies the abolition of success fees in media law cases, citing the decision of the European Convention of Human Rights in MGN v United Kingdon (2011) 39401/04, stating “In the MGN case, the court concluded that the obligation for the defendant to pay a 100% ‘success fee’ to the claimant was disproportionate, and that the conditional fee agreements regime was therefore in breach of the… [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm
” [5] Haack at 21. [6] Haack at 22. [7] Haack at 24, citing Blum v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm
” [5] Haack at 21. [6] Haack at 22. [7] Haack at 24, citing Blum v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
”Expert Statement Jared Holt (Resident Fellow, Digital Forensic Research Lab, Atlantic Council) Expert Statement Brian Hughes (Associate Director, Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab, American University)Expert Statement Aziz Huq (Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School) and Tom Ginsburg (Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School)“Statement on the January 6, 2021 Attacks and the Threat to American Democracy”Expert Statement Sam… [read post]
