Search for: "Knight v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Holland & Knight LLC v Walsam 316, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33748(U) October 17, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654470/2022Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 9:56 pm
In Matter of Novation Capital, LLC v Knight 2008 NY Slip Op 51628 (U)  Decided July 29, 2008. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Holland & Knight LLC v Walsam 316, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33748(U)October 17, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 654470/2022 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 1:22 pm by Tom Smith
Through the use of three policies – the University’s discriminatory harassment policy, its computer policy, and its Just Knights Response Team (JKRT), the school’s version of a bias response team – the University of Central Florida and its administrators have created a series of rules and regulations that restrain, deter, suppress, and punish speech about the political and social issues of the day. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From the Complaint filed Thursday in Avodah Farms v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, a defendant attorney may not obtain communications .from the plaintiff’s current counsel (see, Jakobleff v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:56 am by R. David Donoghue
This is a cross-post written by my partner Anthony Fuga from Holland & Knights Section 101 Blog. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Walsam 316, LLC v Thompson & Knight LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 32693(U) August 2, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156653/2022 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kadah v Kadah 2023 NY Slip Op 32889(U) August 18, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152026/2022 Judge: Richard Latin has an excellent discussion of how privity of contract, a general requirement in legal malpractice claims, can apply both individually and when the law firm is representing a person as an entity, in this case, as administrator of an estate. [read post]