Search for: "Knotts v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm
” The major new case was the ground-breaking decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:17 pm
The D.C. ruling (in a case then titled Maynard v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm
The D.C. ruling (in a case then titled Maynard v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
(Orin Kerr) The DC Circuit has just noted on its docket that it has denied rehearing in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
This is just one more reason that we need the Supreme Court to review the issue.The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm
The Knotts Court applied the test the Supreme Court enunciated in Katz v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:02 pm
Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983) and U.S. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
Knotts rather than the numbers dialed in Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:28 pm
See Kyllo v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:50 am
The Supreme Court first confronted the use of devices to monitor vehiclular movment in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:26 pm
In order to find that GPS devices require a search warrant the Court had to distinguish the use of GPS devices from the use of beepers in the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 10:22 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:35 pm
The government argued that a 1983 Supreme Court case U.S. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
In other Court action, forty-eight states and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief in Snyder v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 5:51 am
Arnett v. [read post]
