Search for: "Konigsberg v. State Bar"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Identification of the records demanded.Noting that Kirsch and Starvaggi had "reasonably described" the requested emails thus enabling the Board to identify and produce the records, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, held that the Board "cannot evade the broad disclosure provisions of [the] statute . . . upon the naked allegation that the request will require review of thousands of records. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Konigsberg v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 75 (1964) (defamation); Konigsberg v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
State, 281 Cal. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am
"); State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Konigsberg v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Konigsberg v. [read post]