Search for: "Kruger v. Kruger"
Results 1 - 20
of 225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
But it unanimously holds that it's true here.Justice Kruger's discussion three-quarters of the way through the opinion is probably as good as one can get on this issue. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Justice Kruger's opinion repeatedly mentions that the Court of Appeal has often encouraged the Legislature to revisit this issue and to think about providing potential parole hearings for all youthful offenders. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm
Thalia Kruger focuses specifically on mediated settlements with a view to illuminating their meaning for the purposes of transnational law. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" In Powell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Koch & Kruger Brokers CC and Another v Financial Sector Conduct Authority and Others (CCT 229/22) [2023] ZACC 27 (15 August 2023) [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 11:29 pm
For instance, the facts in the ECtHR case Künsberg Sarre v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:42 am
I just wanted to give a brief shoutout to Justice Kruger for this opinion earlier today. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:44 pm
“The Curious Failure to Cite to Rehnquist’s Bush v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:01 pm
As the independent state legislature theory remains in limbo in Moore v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
In Michael G. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 2:39 am
Using the Kruger v Coetzee1966 (2) SA 428 (A) at 430E-H negligence test, the court asked whether (a) a person in the position of the defendant would have foreseen the reasonable possibility of this conduct injuring the plaintiff; and (b) whether such person would have taken reasonable steps to guard against such occurrence; and (c) did the defendant fail to take such steps. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
[i] V. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:00 am
This post was written by Pietro Franzina and Thalia Kruger, and is being published simultaneously on Conflictoflaws.net and on the EAPIL blog. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
We should not lightly attribute that intent to the Legislature, particularly given California’s “strong public policy to protect children of tender years” (People v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
Ultimately, EP 065 was found to lack inventiveness in its entirety over Kruger. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
She will speak about Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:32 pm
Thalia Kruger (chairs of the roundtables). [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am
This matter confirmed the well-established legal principle of the reasonable person set out in Kruger v Coetzee [1966 (2) SA 428 (A) at 430E-H], more specifically to medical negligence matters, the standard of the reasonable doctor in the position of the defendant or their employees, acting in the course and scope of their employment. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:32 pm
Courts have left this question open for nearly two decades, but the California Supreme Court finally settled the issue in Lawson v. [read post]
