Search for: "Kuhns v. City of Commerce City"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2013, 9:55 am
City of San Jose v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 8:44 am
Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258, 287 (1972) [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:44 pm
City of San Jose v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Flood v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
In the alternative, the majority opinion found that even if Organized Baseball was not exempt from state antitrust regulation generally, the portion of the remedy imposed by Judge Roller that ordered the National League either to return the Braves to Milwaukee or else give the city a new team ran afoul of the United States Constitution’s Commerce Clause and constituted an unenforceable interference with interstate commerce. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 10:42 am
Baseball Club. of Balt., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:10 pm
Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 (1972), held that MLB could uphold the reserve clause through an anti-trust exemption, however the Court admitted that the exemption was an anomaly and baseball was considered part of interstate commerce. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:10 pm
Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 (1972), held that MLB could uphold the reserve clause through an anti-trust exemption, however the Court admitted that the exemption was an anomaly and baseball was considered part of interstate commerce. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
