Search for: "L V
v.
Review Board"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 11:27 pm
Peter L. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Today, in Honeywell Int'l v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Collins and Judge Thomas L. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:59 pm
In its opinion, the Board provided a detailed example of how the Office is applying the law of chemical obviousness ten years after the Supreme Court's latest pronouncement on obviousness in KSR Int'l. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:58 pm
§ 315(b) in Mayne Pharma Int'l v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 8:31 am
Alcarez-Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:30 am
Wayfair and Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 6:35 pm
Cont’l Auto. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:22 am
Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board's implementation of inter partes review as provided by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (codified at 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:59 pm
This is the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's first application of the Supreme Court's recent Alice Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:23 am
Review Board of Dept. of Workforce... [read post]
Massachusetts Reviewing Board Finds in Favor of Employee in Appeal of Workers’ Compensation Benefits
9 Nov 2015, 8:04 am
In Comeau v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
Service Employees Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Corner Post v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:00 am
DEP, EHB Docket No. 2016-075-L (May 10, 2017), the Board held that it has jurisdiction to review actions taken by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (“PADEP”) involving interstate natural gas pipelines, despite a 2013 decision issued by the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Sequino v Sears Holdings, 206 AD3d 1408and Matter of Ippolito v NYC Tr. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Sequino v Sears Holdings, 206 AD3d 1408and Matter of Ippolito v NYC Tr. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 9:31 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit issued three decisions on Monday relating to Eli Lilly & Co's. challenge in separate inter partes review proceedings on obviousness grounds of nine patents licensed by Teva Pharmaceuticals Int'l, with disparate results. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:43 pm
The case is Dyncorp Int'l v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
Gorsuch)Cette décision complète l'affaire Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
