Search for: "LEIGH v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  But the Cabinet Office is appealing the second part of this decision and Open Democracy has now appointed law firm Leigh Day to go to an information tribunal. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings The fiscal responses to the COVID-19 pandemic will require policymakers to consider what revenue resources should be used to fill budget gaps. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
June 12th is Loving Day, a holiday celebrating the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The cse of ATV ZRT v Hungary concerned sections 12(3) and (4) of the Act which prohibits media service providers from adding ‘any opinion or evaluative explanation to the political news’ without ‘distinguishing it from the news [itself]’. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am by Schachtman
Done, “a former pediatrician from Wayne State University. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
A coalition of 23 states, counties and municipalities sued the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:53 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Witness for the prosecution — Competence Leigh Danielle Williams, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Allegany County of attempted kidnapping and second-degree assault. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
Last year, The IPKat reported on the decision of Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which found that “[T]he right of publicity cannot, consistent with First Amendment, be a right to control the celebrity’s image by censoring disagreeable portrayals. [read post]