Search for: "LEVI STRAUSS & CO. v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH " Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2011, 3:53 am by Greg Akselband
Previously relying on the requirement that a mark be “identical or nearly identical” to the plaintiff’s famous mark for dilution to exist, the 9th Circuit in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:13 pm by One LLP Staff
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court opinion which found Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. did not dilute Levi Strauss’s registered mark, the “Arcuate” design. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am by Gordon Firemark
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx? [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Let the names begin (Intellectual Property Watch) EPO, JPO, USPTO, SIPO and KIPO agree on work sharing initiative (IAM) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPR-Helpdesk) Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants future work to include global policy challenges (Intellectual Property Watch) End of life for IP (Securing Innovation) Royalty monetization: high-profile deals generate excitement among TTOs (Technology Transfer Tactics) Indentifying… [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 9th Circuit changes dilution standard:  Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]