Search for: "LG Display Co., Ltd."
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 8:42 am
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: AU Optronics Corp. of Taiwan AU Optronics Corporation America of Houston, Texas BenQ America Corp. of Irvine, California BenQ Corporation of Taiwan Haier America Trading LLC of New York, New York Haier Group Company of China LG Electronics Inc. of Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey SANYO Electric Co., Ltd. of… [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:30 am
LG Display Co., Ltd., No. 3:11–cv–00729–JFA, 2011 WL 4344074 (D.S.C. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:30 am
LG Display Co., Ltd., No. 3:11–cv–00729–JFA, 2011 WL 4344074 (D.S.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:14 pm
Patent Nos. 6,650,327 (the ‘327 patent), 6,816,145 (the ‘145 patent), and 5,717,881 (the ‘881 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego,… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:52 pm
Patent Nos. 6,650,327 (the ‘327 patent), 6,816,145 (the ‘145 patent), and 5,717,881 (the ‘881 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego,… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 3:26 pm
(“Vizio”), AmTran Technology Co., Ltd., and AmTran Logistics, Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:56 pm
On April 27, 2009, Bock Kwon, a high level executive at LG Display Co. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:27 am
No. 337-TA-634, where Sharp had alleged that Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:59 am
(patent infringement) 12/8: LG Household & Healthcare Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Other companies indicted for the white collar crime include Sharp Corp., LG Display Co., Ltd., and Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
Respondents LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:04 am
(the 'Company') and Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
· In LG Display Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
The defendants named in the action are: AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc.; Chi Mei Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation; Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Hitachi Displays, Ltd.; Hitachi, Ltd.; Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.; LG Display Co., Ltd.; LG Display America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co.,… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:57 pm
Regarding domestic industry, ITRI states that its licensee Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and related entities (collectively, “Samsung”) practice the ‘932 patent in the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:57 am
FlashPoint further alleges that Research In Motion Ltd. and Research In Motion Corp. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:35 am
In 2010, U.S. companies obtained 50.3% of granted patents, compared with 49% in 2009.High-tech patents also dominated areas with the heaviest new patenting activity:Multiplex Communications (US class 370) -- 3.3% of totalSolid-State Devices and Transistors (US class 257) -- 3.1%Semiconductors (US class 438) -- 2.7%Drug Compositions (US class 514) -- 2.1% Data Processing and File Management (US class 707) -- 2%Computers and Processing Systems (US class 709) -- 2%… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
Supreme Court denied a petition for review of that decision.The decision in LG Display Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:18 pm
Regarding domestic industry, ITRI states that it has licensed the ‘459 patent to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Samsung”), and that Samsung conducts significant activities in the U.S. relating to products that practice at least one claim of the ‘459 patent. [read post]
