Search for: "Ladd v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
Ciaravino, 752 S.W.2d 923, 927 (Mo.App. 1988) (quoting State Savings Trust Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Sales LJ was unconvinced that the criteria set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 – intended to reflect the balance of justice in relation to applications to admit fresh evidence – had not been satisfied and KV was unable to demonstrate that evidence such as Dr Cohen’s report could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use earlier. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Again, it falls at the first of the Ladd v Marshall fences. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
  In relation to the evidence, Arnold LJ found that Neo’s application failed on the first criterion set out in Ladd v Marshall. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
  The FRAND element cannot be considered separately for the purpose of the forum conveniens analysis.Relevance of the new evidenceAlthough the new evidence in relation to the Chinese Court Guidelines would be admissible under the first Ladd v Marshall test (couldn't have been submitted at first instance trial) it did not meet the second criteria of having an influence on the outcome of the case. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Yellow Freight Sys., 892 F.2d 74 (4th Cir. 1989)(pro se complaint); Ladd Furniture, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:10 am by Jeff Gamso
Presumably for these reasons, in the 13 years since we decided Penry v. [read post]