Search for: "Laing v. Federal Express Corp."
Results 181 - 200
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Lederle Laboratories, 732 P.2d 297 (Idaho 1987), a vaccine case, the state’s highest court answered some certified questions from a federal court of appeals.As an aside, we have serious qualms about the psychology of certified questions. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
It's kept it up ever since: Western Express, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:40 pm
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe. http://t.co/nc9XIxc D-IL: Attorney-client privilege wont survive a corp.'s death; Ct reviews factors to determine whether corp. has "died. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
A-1 Tool Corp. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
DaimlerChrysler Corp., ___ F.3d ___, 2011 WL 1879210 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
CIBA Vision Corp. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
Preemption is a matter of federal law overriding state law, so it’s logical to think that state judges may have a different perspective than federal ones. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Lust v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Click Here LA area polystyrene manufacturer Lifoam Industries pays $450,000 over violations of federal, state clean-air laws. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Consider Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 4:59 pm
" Vita-Mix Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
(C) Is section 2923.5 preempted by federal law? [read post]
