Search for: "Lak v. Lak" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2024, 7:59 am by Unknown
Attorney Damian Williams last week said the government does not plan to proceed with a second trial of former FTX Chief Executive Sam Bankman-Fried, as widely expected, stating much of the evidence planned for a second trial had already been presented in the first one and could be considered by the court at Bankman-Fried’s March 2024 sentencing (U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:58 pm by John Jascob
The defendant argued that the Second Circuit’s decision in Parkcentral Global Hub Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases (for instance,… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Drawing in witnesses When the Court recognized a public right of access to criminal trials, in Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:22 am by Howard Friedman
  The complaint (full text) in Californians for Equal Rights Foundation v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:17 am by Eugene Volokh
USA, LLC, No. 17-CV-9215 (LAK), 2019 WL 4464672, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:51 am by Ben
 Case 1:13-cv-07874-LAK Bridgeport Music, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
As Shalini Bengani explains in this post,TufAmerica Inc v W B Music Corp 13-cv-7847(LAK), decided by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, is another one of those cases. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
TufAmerica Inc v W B Music Corp 13-cv-7847(LAK), heard by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, had to decide whether Jay Z’s alleged sampling and use of the syllable “oh” in an audio recording and music video entitled Run This Town  amounted to copyright infringement. [read post]