Search for: "Lamb v. General Associates, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 12:10 pm by Tom Lamb
  These bills would permit manufacturers of generic drugs to provide additional warnings about their drugs in the same manner that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allows for brand name manufacturers. (5/15/12) _____________________________________________________________________ The Pliva, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 1:35 pm by Tom Lamb
This is because no such drug injury cases are being filed for those women, much less settled, because at the present time one cannot successfully sue a generic drug manufacturer due the Pliva, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:15 pm by Tom Lamb
In these actions, plaintiffs allege, among other things, that they have suffered osteonecrosis of the jaw, generally subsequent to invasive dental procedures, such as tooth extraction or dental implants and/or delayed healing, in association with the use of Fosamax. [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:34 am
Plaintiff Simon Developed Breast Cancer After Using HRT Drugs Prempro, Premarin, And Provera (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) On May 15, 2007 a Pennsylvania state court jury handed down a mixed verdict in the latest hormone replacement therapy (HRT) products liability case to go to trial, Simon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm by Kelly
Hana Bank (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB precedential no. 41: Parties file cross-motions for summary judgment, then opt for TTAB’s ACR procedure to resolve cancellation: Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
OF FLORIDA, ANDREA LEVINE and STUART KRAMER, Appellees. 4th District.Contracts -- Action against condominium association for electrical work performed on association's building after plaintiff had obtained judgment for payment against developer -- Error to enter summary judgment for defendant association on basis of affirmative defense that property was under the control of developer and that there was never a contract between plaintiff and association --… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(Ars Technica) CAFC: Co-inventors contribution must be 'more than the exercise of ordinary skill'; NTP awarded attorneys' fees: Oren Tavory v NTP (Patently-O) (Law360) (Law360) (Property, intangible) (Patent Prospector) (Property, intangible) PTO announces no IDS or Markush Rules during Bush Administration (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Patently-O) (Patent Docs)   Global Global - General Exploding the intangible asset market cap myth (IP Think Tank) … [read post]