Search for: "Lambert v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
United States Department of Interior, et al. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am
Prior to Sandoz I, Arnold J had held a number of claims of Warner-Lambert’s patent for the use of pregabalin in pain invalid including claim 1 (pain) and claim 3 (neuropathic pain) (“Warner-Lambert V” according to Arnold J’s nomenclature). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:55 pm
Lambert, No. 04-35998 (6-27-08). [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
Mr Justice Arnold was doubtful of this "since the skilled person is located in the UK" (Generics v Warner Lambert, [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat)) (para. 118). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:29 pm
”(emphasis added) (citing Warner-Lambert, 316 F.3d at1354–55). [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 9:32 am
United States, 559 F.2d 1258 (4th Cir. 1977); Atkins v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:33 am
Lloyd's of London, 135 F.3d 1289, 1292 (9th Cir.1998) (applying Rule 12(b)(3) to an international forum-selection clause); Lambert v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:36 am
Lloyd's of London, 135 F.3d 1289, 1292 (9th Cir.1998) (applying Rule 12(b)(3) to an international forum-selection clause); Lambert v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of… [read post]
31 May 2007, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled on Jan. 11, 2006 in Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 10:20 pm
Here’s an interesting new case on the scope of cell phone warrants: United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:44 am
Lambert , and Cash v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Stating a time limit in an unqualified manner does not necessarily remove all flexibility. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:27 am
"
Warner-Lambert Company v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 2:29 pm
From Henry v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 5:39 pm
Lambert v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:37 am
C-36[4] Mattamy v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 6:41 pm
In view of Lambert’s holding that a complaint made to a supervisor does not suffice, the employee did not state a claim for unlawful retaliation under the FLSA, declared the court. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
As recited in the judgment, in 2010 Teva engaged in correspondence with Warner-Lambert stating that it intended to launch generic atorvastatin in November 2011 (after the expiry of the relevant SPC) but then "surreptitiously launched the product on a very large scale in June 2011, before expiry, and without any notice to the patentee." [read post]
