Search for: "Landmark Technology, LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2018, 11:21 am by Mike Worgul
Carpenter vs. the United States is a landmark ruling because the court has shown its willingness to recognize an expectation of privacy in the digital realm. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:22 am by Mark Brennan and Arpan Sura
On January 27, 2020, an Eleventh Circuit panel released a landmark ruling in Glasser v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:45 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
   That case was considered a landmark because it made government wiretapping subject to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirements. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:52 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
   That case was considered a landmark because it made government wiretapping subject to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirements. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm by Scott Bomboy
Upcoming Arguments These significant cases have not yet been scheduled for arguments, both involving giant technology companies. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
Looking for a landmark ruling on patent exhaustion, the patent community got just that in the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Impression Products, Inc. v Lexmark International, Inc. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:21 pm by elliot
Rick had really been sued by Eclipse IP (now called Electronic Communication Technologies LLC), a classic patent troll whose business is demanding licensing fees from real, practicing companies. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:41 pm by Robert C. White Jr.
Technology companies constantly struggle to prove that they are real “grown up” businesses, and a successful IPO by a landmark tech company like Facebook would have really helped to further establish this credibility. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 7:22 am by Ginger Buck
” Constantine Cannon partner Gordon Schnell stated: “we are very excited by this landmark settlement and look forward to our continued work on these matters in the other states. [read post]
When the CJEU refers to “effective prevention” and “serious discouragement” it is clear that this type of additional technological measure will be required; what is not clear is how much further a Member State authority can require a search engine to go. 2. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
(C.D.Cal., Sep. 22, 2014) also finding a common law performance right in pre-1972 sound recordings; and Capital Records, LLC v Sirius XM Radio, Inc (Sup.Ct.Cal. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
Ingrid Kelly’s book Patents for Technology Transfer. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 5:37 am by Siegfried Rivera
“You can do wind tunnel testing; you can do all sorts of testing, especially with the technologies that we now have,” Sobel said. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
 If there are any patent blogs you think should be highlighted by our Top 5, please comment on this post and we’ll check them out. 1) CAFC Blog: Every Patent Practitioner’s Nightmare – Prosecution Mistakes That Can’t be Fixed – This post highlights the matter of Landmark Screens, LLC, v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
 If there are any patent blogs you think should be highlighted by our Top 5, please comment on this post and we’ll check them out. 1) CAFC Blog: Every Patent Practitioner’s Nightmare – Prosecution Mistakes That Can’t be Fixed – This post highlights the matter of Landmark Screens, LLC, v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:31 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Milwaukee lawyer Michael Lueder of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s CFSL Bulletin No Vacation for Employment Law: New “Interpretation” for Independent Contractors Issued by USDOL – Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Shipman & Goodwin in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Iran and World Powers Announce Landmark Nuclear Agreement – Linda Tiller, Cortney Morgan and Michael Holton of Husch Blackwell on the firm’s… [read post]