Search for: "Lapp v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 1:03 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 2:24 pm
Grimmett v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:31 pm
Grimmett, Ralston Lapp Guinn Media Group & Josh Stein for Attorney General Campaign v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 8:55 pm
Olivas (University of Houston Law Center) & Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia (The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law) have posted Plyler v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 10:15 am
Kathleen Kim, Kevin Lapp, & Jennifer Lee (Cambridge University Press, 2022):This contribution to Feminist Judgments: Immigration Law Opinions Rewritten . . . reimagines the Supreme Court’s opinion in Wong Kim Ark v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:14 pm
Instead, it appears it will apply the Lapp Codicil of 1751 (also known as the Magna Carta of the Sami People). [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
In addition to the populations of Bikini and Enewetak, the people of Rongelap and Utirik were also affected by radioactive fallout from the largest nuclear test the United States has ever conducted, the Bravo test held March 1, 1954. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Thus, Williams-Sonoma’s allegations adequately state a claim for tarnishment. * PlayNation Play Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
” Hall v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:13 am
The case was dismissed on summary judgment, but the Court of Appeals revives plaintiff's due process claim.The case is Victory v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
As stated in Playboy Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2013, 9:12 am
” Lappé Dep. 44:19-22 (Aug. 21, 1995), in Roden v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
But see DeLuca v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:10 am
Factual Background In Eagle v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
” In Yeager v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Chubin, et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
The complaint cites Justice Story's dicta in Lowell v Lewis (1817) which stated that inventions that are "injurious to the well being, good policy, or sound morals of society" are unpatentable. [read post]